« My 20 | Main | Back to your tent of hate »

December 04, 2006

Bottled up rage

The Toronto Star filed one of its classic "Here, let us tell you how to live" editorials today, in an attempt to explain that not only does it make sense that Ontarians will soon have to return their wine bottles to the Beer Store, but we're horrible people for not having done it before:

But in the morning-after cleanup, too few revellers will ensure that their empty wine and liquor containers make it into recycling bins, where they belong.

To our shame, one-third of bottles purchased at government-owned liquor stores wind up in garbage dumps. Half of plastic containers and aluminum cans and 75 per cent of Tetra Pak wine boxes sold at these stores meet the same fate. With strong recycling programs in municipalities across Ontario, such environmental laziness is inexcusable.

I don't know anyone who doesn't put their wine bottles in the blue box. Not a single person. I suspect the one-third of bottles that don't get recycled come from apartment buildings, which have spotty recycling facilities if any.

But despite that, bottle deposits make sense to me. What no one has explained to me, and never will -- this is Dalton McGuinty's Ontario we're talking about -- is why I should have to collect those deposits from a third-party location. Or for that matter, why the province is paying -- I should say, why you and I and every other Ontaran are paying -- Brewers' Retail the equivalent of 10 cents per container up front to do all this.

As I pointed out in September, there is nothing special about Brewers' Retail's high-90s recovery rate on bottles. Quebec's supermarket- and convenience store-based system works just as well or better. So even if Ontario was going to stick with its alcohol retail status quo -- regular readers will know where I stand on that -- I'd have no problem whatsoever returning wine bottles whence I purchased them.

But why am I now being encouraged to traipse them miles out of my way -- in a gas-guzzling car, rest assured, or not at all -- to a separate location? How much more convenient a system could that $15 million have purchased? This is nothing but an optically advantageous alcohol tax that disproportionately punishes people who don't own cars, and it exists mostly to tacitly offset Brewers' Retail's longstanding grievance about how much beer the LCBO sells. It is, in a word, garbage.

All my wine bottles go in the blue box as it stands. As of February, they'll be going in there as a protest.

Posted by Chris Selley at December 4, 2006 07:05 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.tartcider.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/587

Comments

Truer words have never been spoken. Although my protest will go unnoticed, I'm sure, since the bottles won't actually make it into the truck. The guy who comes down my street rummaging through the recycling boxes will simply have to add an extra carrier to his bicycle to hold all the wine bottles he's about to start collecting.

Posted by: Sean M at December 4, 2006 11:04 PM

You're spot on, as usual. Unbelievable that any government would get away with a scheme so utterly ridiculous.

Posted by: lk at December 5, 2006 12:44 PM

Chris: I hope you soon turn your talents to getting Toronto to extend its last call. Being feretted out of a bar at 1:30 AM is an embarassing experience and makes just about as much sense as being forced to drive across town to deposit wine bottles.

I blame MADD.


Posted by: Milan at December 5, 2006 03:03 PM

Chris: I hope you soon turn your talents to getting Toronto to extend its last call. Being feretted out of a bar at 1:30 AM is an embarassing experience and makes just about as much sense as being forced to drive across town to deposit wine bottles.

I blame MADD.


Posted by: Milan at December 5, 2006 03:03 PM

You don't fool me, you beer swiller. You don't drink wine!

Hahahah, I'm just kidding. You'll drink anything.

Posted by: Eric at December 5, 2006 06:32 PM

Okay, I live out west, and while the view is obscured by distance some things are crystal clear. McGuinty makes simple things look tough and complicated on purpose, as distraction. He and his party live in a quiet trembling fear that the truly tough and complicated will soon demand a response, and should he not have minor problems running interference the people of Ontario will notice his patent inability to respond to a crisis. Elegant, simple, solutions are beyond him. You might be better off building a pyramid of bottles on the lawn of Queen's Park. When McGuinty sent someone to dismantle the pyramid you would then have the small satsifaction of a lucid response from your premier.

Posted by: Bobbi at December 5, 2006 07:24 PM

I keep my bottles for my own recycling purposes - to bottle my homemade wine. Will I be getting a refund on the deposit?

Posted by: Ian Scott at December 6, 2006 08:49 AM

"Will I be getting a refund on the deposit?"

No - you've just bought the bottle for 10¢

Posted by: DCardno at December 6, 2006 12:22 PM

Remind me again why curbside recycling is a good idea...are we running out of glass? Land? Bauxite?

The original logic of bottle deposits was about combating "litter". The deposits worked splendidly as they encouraged people to return bottles and cans rather than throwing them out car windows.

But every claim advanced for bottle deposits beyond preventing litter should be treated with the same wave of skepticism you reserve for the environmental efficacy of blue box recycling.

Posted by: Jay Currie at December 6, 2006 02:37 PM

The green box (organics) recycling sure does make life convenient for raccoons, though.

Posted by: Chris Taylor at December 6, 2006 05:08 PM

"No - you've just bought the bottle for 10¢"

Incorrect. I purchased the bottle when I purchased the wine. The total cost of the wine, among other things, includes the cost of the bottle to the original winemaker.

Posted by: Ian Scott at December 6, 2006 05:15 PM

"I purchased the bottle when I purchased the wine."

Obviously, you did not. The fact that someone further down the supply chain sold the product (if they did so) on a "bottle included" basis is irrelevant - the person you are buying from is not necessarily doing the same.

Posted by: DCardno at December 6, 2006 07:59 PM

As an Albertan I view the whole beer/wine/liquor retailing system in Ontario as incredibly weird yet scandalous. So you but your liquor at the government store but return the bottles to the beer retailing monopoly? Sounds like I nice kickback to me. Question is, who did the Beer Store people bribe to get this sweetheart retailing deal? (private monopoly on sales and now deposit return) Seriously. It sounds like something out of the Sopranos. Why do Ontarians put up with this? No wonder so many Westerners consider Central Canada another country populated by odd people without a practical bone in their bodies.

Posted by: Tony at December 7, 2006 01:44 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)