The Liberals will have at least one very powerful thing going for them when next they fight an election - the enormous number of Canadians longing for a reason to vote for them. In that respect, it’s not a good idea for Stephen Harper to say things like this:
“We’re bringing forward laws to make sure that we crack down on crime — that we make our streets and communities safer,” he told the House of Commons.
“We want to make sure our selection of judges is in correspondence with those objectives.”
No doubt the Liberals were pursuing their own agendas too with their judicial appointments, to some degree or another. And nobody hates law and order. But confirmational quotes like that are dangerous in this warped universe we live in.
Perhaps there’s a media bias at work — the Globe’s “at least 16 of 33 appointees are partisan Tories” line fairly begs for such accusations. But a new government’s new way of doing something after ages of a different government doing it differently is going to be news no matter what, and the Conservatives can hardly complain that their opponents are issuing nonsensical, spittle-flecked denunciations — except perhaps in a copyright suit.
But Pablo Rodriguez’s Kyoto bill is crazy. This is big, swinging dicks. Forget for now the temerity of the authors of Canada’s Kyoto delinquency attempting to force the government to risk the nation’s economy for cheap political gain. Or… well no, don’t forget that. That’s the whole damn thing.
The fact that Harper hasn’t brought the Conservatives considerable gains in the polls since they took power is often cited as a negative. But the only reason Harper won is because Canada’s natural governing party had finally rendered itself worthy of significant punishment — as such, one might just as soon look at the Liberals’ inability to rebound massively under the un-hateable Bill Graham and under the formerly un-hateable Stéphane Dion as a categorical failure.
I have a lot of time for the idea that environmentalism has become a sort of religion, and religion is a tough thing to beat out of people. But the idea that Canada’s short-term Kyoto targets are unreachable — that’s not just a far-right construct. A lot of very reasonable people have said it. And I suspect a lot of ostensibly devout Canadian environmentalists — the kind with mutual funds and SUVs — might view this legislation a little like ostensibly devout Canadian Catholics tend to view the Vatican’s positions on birth control and abortion.
The Conservative party has yielded a lot to the centre in its 12-plus months in power. Now is not the time for statements supporting a nation of default lefties’ worst fears of a vast right-wing conspiracy. With this nutso Kyoto obsession, the Liberals risk losing an election for the very same reason the Conservatives lost in 2004: because people were reasonably happy with the status quo and irrationally afraid of the alternative.
That’s just where a political party wants to be.